[ad_1]
The Court docket of Attraction, Makurdi Division, has heard the attraction introduced by Hon. Moses Agaba in opposition to the choice of the Excessive Court docket to put aside the interim order restraining Comrade Austin Agada because the Benue State Chairman of the All Progressives Congress, APC.
Hon.Agaba, on this attraction, is difficult the ruling of Justice M. A. Ikpambese, the Chief Decide of Benue State, for setting apart the interim order issued by the Benue State Excessive Court docket, Aliade Division restraining Agada from parading himself because the Chairman of APC, Benue State Chapter.
Arguing the Attraction, Moses Agaba’s Counsel, Matthew Burkaa, SAN, adopted his transient of argument and submitted that the Chief Decide of the decrease courtroom was flawed to have retrieved the case file from one other decide of the Excessive Court docket and put aside the interim order issued by the opposite decide.
He contended that doing so amounted to the Chief Decide sitting on attraction over the choice of a decide of coordinate jurisdiction.
Responding, Counsel to Austin Agada, Yakubu Philemon, SAN, adopted his transient and contended that the decrease Court docket was proper in setting apart the interim injunction as a result of the order, which was meant to subsist for less than 7 days, had elapsed on twelfth February, 2024, and there was no utility to breathe life into it once more when it was put aside.
In one other growth, the Court docket of Attraction has additionally heard the attraction difficult the ruling and judgment of the Nationwide Industrial Court docket of Nigeria, (NICN), Makurdi Division, delivered on the fifteenth of June 2023 whereby the Court docket refused to contemplate processes filed by Counsel to the Appellants difficult jurisdiction of the Court docket to listen to the go well with filed by the 23 former Native Authorities Council Chairmen in Benue State, who had been elected underneath the platform of the PDP.
Counsel to Appellants, S. A. Akpehe, Esq, adopted his transient and maintained that the decrease courtroom had no jurisdiction to entertain the go well with of the 23 former LG Chairmen as a result of the subject material of the go well with was not an industrial challenge.
The courtroom, having heard the arguments of Counsel, reserved judgment within the appeals to a date to be communicated to the events.
[ad_2]
Source link
